Producer-based course list →

READ · COMPARE · EXPLAIN

Bellavista: Alma – grape varieties, vintage, and sugar figures

A Franciacorta producer based in Erbusco, Lombardy. For Alma Assemblage, Bellavista selects base wines from many vineyards and blends wines from different harvest years.

Please explain Assemblage 2 with respect to the proportions of grape varieties, the use of wines from multiple vintages, and the two sugar-related figures.

Questions for this course

Is Assemblage 2 a wine only made in 2022?

Before you start reading, briefly jot down your thoughts. You will rephrase them at the end.

To applied practice using the material ↓

To explanation task notes ↓

Bellavista / Learn from the producers

Italy / Lombardy / Franciacorta

Alternative name/label: Bellavista / ベラヴィスタ

Updated: 2026-10-07

Proportion of the three varieties

The technical sheet for Assemblage 2 states: Chardonnay 86%, Pinot Nero 13%, Pinot Bianco 1%. These three refer to the grape composition. This is a breakdown by variety, not by the number of vineyards or the vintages of the base wines. Do not sum the different percentages as if they pertained to the same blending table.

Main harvest years and reserve wines

The material describes the 2022 harvest, while clearly stating that reserve wines from previous years are also used. Therefore, it cannot be said that only wine from 2022 is used. Distinguish between the edition number, the main harvest year, and the years included in the base wine when reading.

Dosage amount and total sugar content

It states that the dosage is 2g/L and total sugar is 3.3g/L. The amount added through dosage and the final sugar content of the finished wine are separate figures. Aging on lees is given as an average of 30 months, setting time conditions that are not reflected by sweetness category alone.

What to align and what to compare.

Grapes

Conditions to standardize
Assemblage 2
Conditions for comparison.
Proportion of three varieties
Additional points to confirm
Different from the vintage year of the base wine

year

Conditions to standardize
Same edition
Conditions for comparison.
Main harvest years and reserves
Additional points to confirm
Do not interpret the number as the vintage

Sugar

Conditions to standardize
Display of g/L
Conditions for comparison.
Dosage amount and total sugar content
Additional points to confirm
Target of the numbers

Order of reading and key points to consider in each article

0 / 3 articles completed

Next article →

Progress is recorded as the completion of reading articles. This does not include completion of explanatory assignments.

  1. 1

    Italy

    Franciacorta

    Read about Franciacorta.

    ↗
  2. 2

    Italy

    Differences between second fermentation in the bottle and the tank method.

    Review dosage and aging.

    ↗
  3. 3

    Italy

    DOCG, DOC, IGT and EU Geographical Indications

    Distinguish between DOCG and label indication.

    ↗

READ · HYPOTHESIZE · RECONSIDER

Document analysis for Bellavista: Alma – grape varieties, vintage, and sugar figures

Match comparison tables with cited sources and explain differences in raw materials and vinification process.

Comparison tables are based on the cited sources. Please distinguish between vintage-specific specifications and general descriptions at the time of confirmation.

Comparison itemsNumerical valueSubject
86・13・1%Chardonnay / PN / PBBreakdown of grape varieties
2022 and reserve bottlingBase wine from multiple years.Not a single vintage
2/3.3g/LDosage / total sugarDifference between dosage amount and total amount

Each hypothesis or reflection can be up to 2,000 characters. You can save your answers even if you only select an option.

1. Which variety makes up the largest share of the blend?
2. What can be said based on the mention of 2022?
3. What does 2 g/L refer to?

View in study notebook →

Manually save to this browser. When you reopen, you can continue from where you left off. This is a separate record from the course explanation task notes. If you save with all fields unselected or blank, this exercise record will be deleted.

Read the explanation for each question

By answering in the selection field, you can compare your answers and explanations using the top button. Freeform responses will not be automatically graded.

Which variety makes up the largest share of the blend?
The technical sheet for Assemblage 2 states: Chardonnay 86%, Pinot Nero 13%, Pinot Bianco 1%. These three refer to the grape composition. This is a breakdown by variety, not by the number of vineyards or the vintages of the base wines. Do not sum the different percentages as if they pertained to the same blending table.

What can be inferred from the mention of 2022?
The material describes the 2022 harvest, while clearly stating that reserve wines from previous years are also used. Therefore, it cannot be said that only wine from 2022 is used. Distinguish between the edition number, the main harvest year, and the years included in the base wine when reading.

What does 2 g/L refer to?
It states that the dosage is 2g/L and total sugar is 3.3g/L. The amount added through dosage and the final sugar content of the finished wine are separate figures. Aging on lees is given as an average of 30 months, setting time conditions that are not reflected by sweetness category alone.

Basis and sources for the exercise

Practice exercises in comparison

Match comparison tables with cited sources and explain differences in raw materials and vinification process.

Read examples of organizing comparisons
Conditions for ComparisonNumerical valueSubject
86・13・1%Chardonnay / PN / PBBreakdown of grape varieties
2022 and reserve bottlingBase wine from multiple years.Not a single vintage
2/3.3g/LDosage / total sugarDifference between dosage amount and total amount

Sources of materials used for comparison are listed in the text and exercises.

Explain in your own words

Please explain Assemblage 2 with respect to the proportions of grape varieties, the use of wines from multiple vintages, and the two sugar-related figures.

Check after writing

  • Did you associate each label with its region and grape variety?
  • Did you separate the shared and differing conditions in your comparison?
  • Did you clearly indicate the year(s) the material covers or the date checked?

Save response to explanation task

Compare your initial thoughts with how they have changed after reading the article.

Maximum 5,000 characters. This is stored within this browser. Press "Save" to record your note. Saving a blank will delete this note.

View saved notes →

Next question

Ca’ del Bosco: changing dosage for the same label →

Choose another theme →