Producer-based course list →

READ · COMPARE · EXPLAIN

Domaine Faiveley: Regions and Classification in the Same Producer

This domaine is based in Nuits-Saint-Georges and produces wines spanning Côte de Nuits, Côte de Beaune, and Côte Chalonnaise. They also have multiple labels in Mercurey.

Sort the three monopoles by map and classification, and select combinations that can be compared within the same village.

Questions for this course

Are all monopole wines of the same classification?

Before you start reading, briefly jot down your thoughts. You will rephrase them at the end.

To applied practice using the material ↓

To explanation task notes ↓

Domaine Faiveley / Study by producer

France / Burgundy / Nuits-Saint-Georges, Mercurey

Other names & notations: Domaine Faiveley / ドメーヌ・フェヴレ

Update date: 2026-09-24

Production area broader than the base location

The list for Faiveley includes both wines from the Côte de Nuits and Beaune and Mercurey from the Côte Chalonnaise. Even by locating the company headquarters on a map, you cannot know the origin of each wine’s grapes from that alone.

Two monopoles in Mercurey

La Framboisière is listed as a village wine and Clos des Myglands as a premier cru, with both being monopoles. This allows you to compare the classification difference while retaining their status as single-owner vineyards.

Corton also changes by location.

The list also includes the Grand Cru Corton Clos des Cortons Faiveley, which is also a monopole. However, when compared to Mercurey, both the region and classification change. Do not attribute flavor differences to classification alone.

What to align and what to compare.

La Framboisière

Conditions to standardize
Domaine Faiveley
Conditions for comparison.
Mercurey Village / Monopole
Additional points to confirm
Even if monopole, the village name may still be used

Clos des Mouches

Conditions to standardize
Domaine Faiveley
Conditions for comparison.
Mercurey Premier Cru / Monopole
Additional points to confirm
Even with the same village name, different classifications exist.

Clos des Corton Faiveley

Conditions to standardize
Domaine Faiveley
Conditions for comparison.
Corton Grand Cru/Monopole
Additional points to confirm
Both regional boundaries and classifications can change.

Order of reading and key points to consider in each article

0 / 3 articles completed

Next article →

Progress is recorded as the completion of reading articles. This does not include completion of explanatory assignments.

  1. 1

    France

    Burgundy

    Organize the names of villages and vineyards on a map.

    ↗
  2. 2

    France

    Interpreting climat and Cru

    Confirming the relationship between climat and classification.

    ↗
  3. 3

    France

    Pinot Noir

    Check the relationship between grape variety, vineyard, and winemaking.

    ↗

READ · HYPOTHESIZE · RECONSIDER

Reading Domaine Faiveley’s Materials: Regions and Classification in the Same Producer

Compare the stated conditions in the documentation. Numbers specifying vintages should be treated as information for that specific year.

This summarizes materials published by producers, regional groups, and importers. Each source includes the publisher and the date the material was checked.

Comparison itemsWhat can be determined from the materialsAbility to distinguish by reading
La FramboisièreMercurey Village / MonopoleEven if monopole, the village name may still be used
Clos des MouchesMercurey Premier Cru / MonopoleEven with the same village name, different classifications exist.
Clos des Corton FaiveleyCorton Grand Cru/MonopoleBoth regional boundaries and classifications can change.

Each hypothesis or reflection can be up to 2,000 characters. You can save your answers even if you only select an option.

1. In which region is Mercurey located?
2. What do the two Mercurey wines have in common?
3. Compared to Corton, what changes?

View in study notebook →

Manually save to this browser. When you reopen, you can continue from where you left off. This is a separate record from the course explanation task notes. If you save with all fields unselected or blank, this exercise record will be deleted.

Read the explanation for each question

By answering in the selection field, you can compare your answers and explanations using the top button. Freeform responses will not be automatically graded.

Which region is Mercurey in?
The base location is in a different area from Nuits.

What do the two Mercureys have in common?
You can compare classifications by unifying ownership formats.

What changes when compared to Corton?
I interpret this as a comparison where multiple factors are different at the same time. With two Mercurey wines, you can compare classifications within the same village, but adding a Corton changes the location as well. The fact that all are monopoles doesn't mean the origin or classification of the grapes is the same.

Basis and sources for the exercise

Practice exercises in comparison

Please explain differences in raw materials and winemaking by reading the table and sources.

Read examples of organizing comparisons
Conditions for ComparisonComparison itemsWhat can be determined from the materialsAbility to distinguish by reading
La FramboisièreMercurey Village / MonopoleEven if monopole, the village name may still be used
Clos des MouchesMercurey Premier Cru / MonopoleEven with the same village name, different classifications exist.
Clos des Corton FaiveleyCorton Grand Cru/MonopoleBoth regional boundaries and classifications can change.

Sources of materials used for comparison are listed in the text and exercises.

Explain in your own words

Sort the three monopoles by map and classification, and select combinations that can be compared within the same village.

Check after writing

  • Did you specify the label, vintage, and scope of materials to be compared?
  • Did you distinguish and explain the three items in the table?
  • Did you separate verified facts from points to check further with additional references or tasting?

Save response to explanation task

Compare your initial thoughts with how they have changed after reading the article.

Maximum 5,000 characters. This is stored within this browser. Press "Save" to record your note. Saving a blank will delete this note.

View saved notes →

Next question

Joseph Drouhin: separating vineyard names and owned plots →

Choose another theme →